Advances in the theory of argumentation schemes and critical questions D Godden, D Walton Informal Logic 27, 267-292, 2007 | 79 | 2007 |
A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation D Godden, D Walton Pragmatics & Cognition 15 (2), 313-346, 2007 | 73 | 2007 |
Wittgenstein and the logic of deep disagreement D Godden, WH Brenner Cogency: Journal of reasoning and argumentation 2 (2), 41-80, 2010 | 71 | 2010 |
Argument from expert opinion as legal evidence: Critical questions and admissibility criteria of expert testimony in the American legal system D Godden, D Walton Ratio Juris 19 (3), 261-286, 2006 | 60 | 2006 |
Navigating the visual turn in argument L Groarke, CH Palczewski, D Godden Argumentation and Advocacy 52 (4), 217-235, 2016 | 57 | 2016 |
Informal logic and the dialectical approach to argument D Walton, D Godden Reason Reclaimed, 3-17, 2007 | 51 | 2007 |
The nature and status of critical questions in argumentation schemes D Walton, D Godden The uses of argument: Proceedings of the 6th Ontario Society for the Study …, 2005 | 45 | 2005 |
On common knowledge and ad populum: Acceptance as grounds for acceptability D Godden Philosophy and Rhetoric 41 (2), 101-129, 2008 | 35 | 2008 |
Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution D Walton, D Godden Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2), 273-295, 2005 | 34 | 2005 |
Psychologism in the logic of John Stuart Mill: Mill on the subject matter and foundations of ratiocinative logic D Godden History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (2), 115-143, 2005 | 32 | 2005 |
Deductivism as an interpretative strategy: A reply to Groarke's defense of reconstructive deductivism D Godden Argumentation and Advocacy 41, 168-183, 2005 | 31 | 2005 |
On the priority of agent-based argumentative norms D Godden Topoi: An international review of philosophy 35, 345-357, 2016 | 29 | 2016 |
The importance of belief in argumentation: Belief, commitment and the effective resolution of a difference of opinion D Godden Synthese 172 (3), 397-414, 2010 | 28 | 2010 |
A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency D Godden, F Zenker Synthese 195 (4), 1715-1740, 2018 | 25 | 2018 |
Denying the antecedent as a legitimate argumentative strategy: A dialectical model D Godden, D Walton Informal Logic 24 (3), 219-243, 2004 | 23 | 2004 |
Argumentation, rationality, and psychology of reasoning D Godden Informal Logic ISSN: 0824-2577 35 (2), 135-166, 2015 | 22 | 2015 |
On the norms of visual argument DM Godden | 22 | 2013 |
On the norms of visual argument: A case for normative non-revisionism D Godden Argumentation 31 (2), 395-431, 2017 | 18 | 2017 |
Psychologism and the development of Russell's account of propositions D Godden, N Griffin History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (2), 171-186, 2009 | 17 | 2009 |
Defeasibility in judicial opinion: Logical or procedural? D Godden, D Walton Informal Logic 28 (1), 6-19, 2008 | 16 | 2008 |