Follow
Noah van Dongen
Noah van Dongen
Verified email at uva.nl
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Estimating the reproducibility of experimental philosophy
F Cova, B Strickland, A Abatista, A Allard, J Andow, M Attie, J Beebe, ...
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12, 9-44, 2021
2162021
Implicit emotion regulation in the context of viewing artworks: ERP evidence in response to pleasant and unpleasant pictures
NNN Van Dongen, JW Van Strien, K Dijkstra
Brain and Cognition 107, 48-54, 2016
1012016
A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being
S Hoogeveen, A Sarafoglou, B Aczel, Y Aditya, AJ Alayan, PJ Allen, ...
Religion, Brain & Behavior 13 (3), 237-283, 2023
612023
Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies
B Aczel, B Szaszi, G Nilsonne, OR Van Den Akker, CJ Albers, ...
Elife 10, e72185, 2021
45*2021
Multiple perspectives on inference for two simple statistical scenarios
NNN van Dongen, JB van Doorn, QF Gronau, D van Ravenzwaaij, ...
The American Statistician 73 (sup1), 328-339, 2019
412019
Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practice
EJ Wagenmakers, A Sarafoglou, S Aarts, C Albers, J Algermissen, ...
Nature human behaviour 5 (11), 1473-1480, 2021
352021
Intuitions about the Reference of Proper Names: A Meta-Analysis
N van Dongen, M Colombo, F Romero, J Sprenger
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1-30, 2020
212020
Productive Explanation: A Framework for Evaluating Explanations in Psychological Science
N van Dongen, R van Bork, A Finnemann, H van der Maas, D Robinaugh, ...
PsyArXiv, 2022
13*2022
The science of art: the universality of the law of contrast
NNN Van Dongen, J Zijlmans
The American Journal of Psychology 130 (3), 283-294, 2017
132017
Comparing theories with the Ising model of explanatory coherence.
M Maier, N van Dongen, D Borsboom
Psychological Methods, 2023
112023
Objectivity for the research worker
N van Dongen, M Sikorski
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3), 93, 2021
112021
A Bayesian perspective on severity: Risky predictions and specific hypotheses
N van Dongen, J Sprenger, EJ Wagenmakers
PsyArXiv, 2020
112020
Moderate contrast in the evaluation of paintings is liked more but remembered less than high contrast
K Dijkstra, NNN van Dongen
Frontiers in psychology 8, 275303, 2017
112017
Causal conditionals, tendency causal claims and statistical relevance
M Sikorski, N van Dongen, J Sprenger
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1-26, 2024
52024
Strong public claims may not reflect researchers' private convictions
J van Doorn, EJ Wagenmakers
Significance 18 (1), 44-45, 2021
52021
Overview on the null hypothesis significance test
N van Dongen, L van Grootel
PsyArXiv, 2021
52021
Monocyte response after colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study
PP Edomskis, WA Dik, CL Sparreboom, N Nagtzaam, Y Bayon, ...
Frontiers in Immunology 13, 1031216, 2022
42022
Perspectives on scientific error
D van Ravenzwaaij, M Bakker, R Heesen, F Romero, N van Dongen, ...
Royal Society Open Science 10 (7), 230448, 2023
22023
Severity and Crises in Science: Are We Getting It Right When We're Right and Wrong When We're Wrong?
A Claesen, D Lakens, N van Dongen
PsyArXiv, 2022
22022
Practicing theory building in a many modelers hackathon: A proof of concept
N van Dongen, A Finnemann, J de Ron, L Tiokhin, S Wang, ...
PsyArXiv, 2022
12022
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20